I admit that if it were up to me, I would probably have started playing Mario Kart on M. G.'s N64 rather than watch a two-hour documentary about Tony Blair's life. However, I am glad that I watched it. It has given me much to think about, in spite of the fact that I don't really think it went very deep, nor tell me anything that I didn't really already know, save for a few details of Blair's formative years.
The documentary was full of what J. M. Keynes would have called 'wild facts' — I wonder if Blair might have benefited from looking a bit further into the reservoir of political economic history before making some of his key decisions. There are plenty of wild facts in Blair's life, as in everyone's: the suicide of a best friend at the age of nineteen, the death of a mother from throat cancer while Blair was still graduating, the conflicts of loyalty to friends and party — these are truly wild facts. Absurd, unpredictable, but highly powerful events. More powerful, undoubtedly, than anything rational by which we attempt to govern our lives. There are, too, plenty of wild facts in Blair's political life: John Smith's death, Kosovan ethnic cleansing, September 11th 2001; events with far greater power than events in the realm of political debate. I admired one thing in Blair that came through in this documentary: his determination to take these wild facts in hand, and to use them as means of mobilisation to action. And indeed, this trend has been around for hundreds of years now. It is the stuff of pragmatism, diplomacy: the stuff of reading situations from the ground up, of making the events, the problems, your starting point, and using the information they give you to form your resolutions to action.
Unnecessarily, and partially paradoxically, it seems that it is Blair's strength of faith which has got in his way, and blinded his sight, too often. His principles have been derived from his faith, rather than his faith being inspired by his analysis of the 'wild facts' of the events around him. And we need not look far to find problems when principles drive action without reference to context. Iraq is an example, though too sensitive an example. Too fresh. But there are different examples. What about when economic principles unrelentingly drove an unregulated market during the industrial revolution? Its consequences were disastrous, in terms of poverty, abuse, and intimidation, because the economists made no reference to the realities of the world, beyond the mathematics of economic theory. Yet at the same time, without his faith, Tony Blair would undoubtedly have done much less, achieved much less, and created much less good in Britain. Unfortunately, as with so many, the very same convictions which drive good decisions also end up driving bad decisions.
And so Tony Blair becomes another 'wild fact' of political history, as will so many like him in the future, making the same mistakes.